Professional Skipper Magazine from VIP Publications

#S95 Sep-Oct 2013 with NZ Aquaculture

The only specialised marine publication in Oceania that focuses on the maritime industry, from super yachts to small craft to large commercial ships, including coastal shipping, tugs, tow boats, barges, ferries, tourist, sport-fishing craft

Issue link: https://viewer.e-digitaleditions.com/i/172326

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 79 of 108

V P.S95 VIIP.S9 VIP.S95 P 9 Two brothers have been convicted in the Nelson District court after a night raid in Kaikoura found them in possession of sacks of paua. Day Van Tang admitted a charge of poaching paua, and Hanh Tang admitted illegal possession of paua and was fined $2000. Early last year fisheries officers received information about Day Van Tang illegally taking paua from the Kaikoura coast during the night. He would drive to a secluded spot along the coast known as Black Miller, at low tide when the paua could be found and levered off rocks by feel in knee-high water. During the night of July 3 last year, Day Van Tang, who has already been imprisoned for stealing paua, and his brother Hanh, drove from Nelson to Kaikoura. Some of the paua they gathered was shucked at the water's edge but, in total, two sacks were carried to the road and concealed in long grass. Day Van Tang retrieved the sacks and the brothers left the area. Fisheries officers stopped Day Van Tang a short time later and seized from the boot of the car the two sacks of paua, a knife, and a screwdriver. The sacks contained a total of 139 paua, 115 of which were undersized. Rules state the maximum number of paua that each of the brothers could have taken on any one day is 10. The minimum length of the shellfish that can be taken is 125mm. Fisheries officers also recovered 13 freshly shucked shells from the tidal area where Day Van Tang had been shucking paua. He admitted that he and his brother had taken the shellfish found in the car, but denied knowing what paua was, and considered them "whelks". He later admitted that he knew they were paua, and that he had gone to Kaikoura specifically to take them. He also knew the daily limit, and that he had not measured any of the paua taken. In answer to a question from Judge Tony Zohrab about why the pair had taken undersized paua, defence lawyer David Holloway said he supposed it might have been difficult for them to detect the size of the shellfish because they were taken at night. Holloway also said it was perhaps a naive explanation, but they had taken so many because of the distance travelled that required time off work. He said the paua were taken for them to eat and not to sell. Judge Zohrab said the pair knew what they were doing was illegal and that New Zealand's "very large foreshore" made such offending difficult to detect. ON WA STA TE ND RB 3 OA 18 TS HO W ILLEGAL POSSESSION OF PAUA Raymond Wayne Major, was sentenced in the Rotorua District Court to 200 hours' community work after previously pleading guilty to two charges of selling paua taken without a current fishing permit. The Rotorua man sold illegal paua from a Facebook page. He was also ordered to forfeit items of his dive gear. An undercover Ministry for Primary Industries officer replied to a Facebook post and on February 17 they met in the Pak 'n' Save carpark where he paid Major $100 for 40 paua. Five days later saw Major meeting and selling the officer another 20 paua for $50. Major told Judge John Macdonald it had been his daughter's birthday and he didn't have enough money to pay for it. He said at the time he didn't realise the seriousness of his actions, but now knew it was wrong. The judge accepted there had been a certain amount of ignorance and Major's offending was unsophisticated. www.skipper.co.nz VIP.S93 UNSOPHISTICATED OFFENDING September/October 2013 Professional Skipper 77

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Professional Skipper Magazine from VIP Publications - #S95 Sep-Oct 2013 with NZ Aquaculture